This. I hope he has a plan. I really do, but that is just a lot of words that basically say we will spend a boatload of money to come up with an answer.
OR...the very low threshold has painted the picture as worse than it really is and it is important to reset the metric to give a more fair picture, so we can actually know how to proceed.
Using a PCR of 40 is about as smart as comparing a temperature of 99.5 and 104 and saying both are dangerous fevers.
Yep, the whole media narrative is about change from destroy mode to protect mode when biden gets in. It is what it is.
240,000 deaths paints a pretty bad picture regardless of whether we use 35 or 40 as the PCR threshold. And we will likely top 300,000 deaths by the end of this year. I can remember when you were incredulous at my post where I said we could reach 150,000 deaths.
I was, and admitted long ago my underestimation. In fact, I think it was an even lower number that I doubted. I would ask though if it is possible to assume that a lot of those deaths may have been people who tested positive using a sub 40 PCR?
COVID-19 Linked to Increased Risk for Parkinson's Another possible long-term complication of covid 19. Letting this spread uncontrolled is immoral and UNNECCESARY