Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Gator Country Black Friday special!

    Now's a great time to join or renew and get $20 off your annual VIP subscription! LIMITED QUANTITIES -- for details click here.

Coronavirus in the United States - news and thoughts

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorNorth, Feb 25, 2020.

  1. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,072
    54,980
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    There is more than the death rate, tilly. Again, this has all been explained. . . . time and time agin. The infection rate is an important factor. The lack of a vaccine is an important factor. I respect your wish to be optimistic; I really do. But the evidence continually indicates that this is much more devastating than the flu.
    One chart shows how many Americans are dying from the coronavirus each week compared with other common causes of death like heart disease, cancer, and the flu
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. RIP

    RIP I like touchdowns Premium Member

    6,949
    1,979
    3,313
    Feb 2, 2015
    Ah ok. The death rate is much less important to me than overall deaths. If the rate is 0.1% but 60% get it that's still 216k dead. That alone prices to me that all of this was worth it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,048
    2,067
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    My concern with that study is it seems far more likely that means the antibody testing is popping a fair amount of false positives. That could be a very big problem if the goal is to utilize that to try to keep people safe. I do think that our stated infection rate is way higher than the official numbers, but I doubt it is anywhere near that degree. In fact, if I had to guess, I'd probably put it about an order of magnitude lower, although wouldn't be shocked about it being double that or so.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. mutz87

    mutz87 p=.06 VIP Member

    38,229
    33,866
    4,211
    Aug 30, 2014
    Flu death rate 2018-2019=.0096 (34,157 deaths/35,520,883 symptomatic illnesses)
    Flu symptom rate 1040 times more than flu death
    Covid-19 (based on estimate in tweet up thread= .60
    Covid-19 symptom rate (based on tweet estimate) 8 times more than death rate
    Covid-19 62.5 times more deadly than flu, even at this much lower number.

    #nottheflu
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  5. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    2017 was close and during its peak it very well may have.
     
  6. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Good data Mutz, but that all goes out the window if antibody testing shows anything close to the preliminary numbers.
    (I agree that Santa Clara is a unique sample), so time will tell, but it ...could...be some good news.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
  7. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Within a week or so, 0.1% of the population of the entire state of New York will have died of this. That's about 20,000 people in a state of about 20 million people. So for COVID-19 to have the same mortality rate as typical flu does (0.1%), we'd have to assume that every single person in the state of NY has been infected. I doubt that is the case.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  8. 14serenoa

    14serenoa Living in Orange and surrounded by Seminoles... VIP Member

    4,756
    1,693
    2,088
    Jul 28, 2014
    this dude must be tied up and gagged.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. RIP

    RIP I like touchdowns Premium Member

    6,949
    1,979
    3,313
    Feb 2, 2015
    We will have to wait till this one is almost done to fairly compare peak times. I should have said has any seasonal flu gone from 1 death to 40k in 60 days.
     
    Last edited: Apr 17, 2020
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    I agree....and again...I was speaking PURELY about death rate. I failed to say that in he original post, but have said it several time since. Sorry if I was not clear.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Valid point. You would also have to assume that this disease acts the exact same way in every environment. 99% of us don't live right on top of each other.
     
  12. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,048
    2,067
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    So would you say the same about Trump's name calling and those that cheer it on?
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  13. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,771
    1,838
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    FWIW the mortality rate is not independent of the actions we’ve taken.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Like Like x 2
  14. mutz87

    mutz87 p=.06 VIP Member

    38,229
    33,866
    4,211
    Aug 30, 2014
    TY, supertilly!

    I'm all for positive news. Just urge caution re: over-interpretation/overgeneralizing.

    Even if this winds up being closer to flu death rates, it will still be a major threat until we have a vaxx & treatments, unless somehow like SARS it just up and disappears (as Fauci explained about why we don't have a SARS vaxx).

    I also think because we tend to think of the flu as perhaps only a little worse than a common cold, we fool ourselves a bit.

    And if this is true, it's easy to imagine people not getting proper treatment, perhaps until it's too late.

    So maybe instead of thinking the Covid-19 is more like the flu, we should think the flu is more like Covid-19? .nah mean? :)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,771
    1,838
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    Don’t know the details of that Stanford study. I really like the idea behind it. Maybe this was addressed, but it could have suffered from selection bias where people who felt they may have been exposed were more likely to volunteer to get tested.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  16. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,282
    5,284
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Studies like this are going on all over the country.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  17. mutz87

    mutz87 p=.06 VIP Member

    38,229
    33,866
    4,211
    Aug 30, 2014
    Selection bias is one of the concerns raised by a few epidemiologists who've weighed in.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    I would if he posted here and broke the rules. :)
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  19. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    31,936
    12,102
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Are you equally offended by the petty names T calls anyone who disagrees with him?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
  20. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,272
    8,091
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    when did the flu ever either spread to 35,000,000 or kill 35,000 people in 6 weeks?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1