Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Gator Country Black Friday special!

    Now's a great time to join or renew and get $20 off your annual VIP subscription! LIMITED QUANTITIES -- for details click here.

Coronavirus in the United States - news and thoughts

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorNorth, Feb 25, 2020.

  1. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    11,705
    2,576
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Insane. Name calling?!? Please. Obama was called Obummer, Zero, and every name there was. Hilary too. The moderators changed the rules AFTER Trump was elected to no name calling and still the right can’t take it.

    The Obama years were posts of made up stories. Conservatives are taken to task for what Donald Trump says and does. It’s no comparison.
     
    • Winner Winner x 11
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  2. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,519
    1,775
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    I don't want to hijack the thread with this. I'm sending you a PM.
     
  3. Bazza

    Bazza Moderator

    37,842
    14,726
    3,803
    Jan 2, 2009
    New Smyrna Beach
    Another and more plausible "theory" is they have much better ways to spend their time. :devil:

    [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  4. creekgator

    creekgator All American

    425
    50
    1,748
    Apr 3, 2007
    I am surviving just fine.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,292
    5,287
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Trump called Coronavirus a Democratic Hoax. He opened the door. And his handling of this is fairly in issue given that this is an election year. You will forgive us if we hold against him his labeling of a worldwide pandemic as a political hoax; his suggestions to Pence to not communicate with the governor of Michigan about aid needed there because she criticized the presidential response; his claim that the numbers were going to zero: his late response: the lack of development of tests so we can have testing and information. Trump bears the stain of history for this. As for the exodus, that was a year and a half ago. For the most part, A bunch of Seth Rich type conspiracy theorists who were insulting and broke rear here repeatedly. It was OK for them to rip Obama, but they ran because people don’t rally around Trump in times like this? Please spare us. They can enjoy their safe space on TOS. There are enough people here who defended all of Trump’s false claims and are now shifting to blame governors. All of a sudden this is a surprise? Trump ignored months of advance notice. He deserves criticism. As do the posters who parrot ever changing talking points which, now, contradict the early talking points. It is called accountability. And it isn’t an insult or personal. It is fair comment on the assertions Made by both.
     
    • Winner Winner x 12
  6. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,292
    5,287
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Why are we developing this test so late? When did the study to develop the test start? December? January? When did Trump start directing this?
     
  7. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,519
    1,775
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    How the United States lost a month of testing

    The Lost Month: How a Failure to Test Blinded the U.S. to Covid-19
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Informative Informative x 3
  8. saltygator

    saltygator Premium Member

    332
    72
    1,863
    Apr 3, 2007
    Why coronavirus antibody testing in one Colorado town could provide a way forward

    It looks like the FDA approved a testing protocol last week for antibodies which would help identify ways to help "cure" sick people. I haven't searched the web too deeply, but as I posted yesterday, this is relatively new, in the sense that the FDA approved it. I'm not a scientist or medical professional, so please excuse any ignorance on my part. Just trying to keep posting positive info...
     
    • Informative Informative x 4
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  9. gatorstevelp

    gatorstevelp Premium Member

    2,773
    747
    1,963
    Apr 3, 2007
    Don't think it is late at all. Pretty amazing how quickly things get done when the pressure is on with approvals, trials etc. There are already over 80 ongoing human clinical trials working on a vaccine. Using the worlds most powerful supercomputer, Summit, researchers used the mapped COVID-19 protein structure data from teams at the University of Texas and NIH and they have already narrowed down the 7 most promising compounds that will potentially be the most effective in binding to the COVID-19 proteins to create a vaccine.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. gatorstevelp

    gatorstevelp Premium Member

    2,773
    747
    1,963
    Apr 3, 2007
    I'm confident they will quickly ramp up the antibody testing just like they did with the tests so as to have meaningful data to study. You are starting to see where they are beginning to test entire cities.
    Also it would not surprise me if the infected is not at least 50X what has been confirmed. Will be interesting what comes out of the antibody testing.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. gatorstevelp

    gatorstevelp Premium Member

    2,773
    747
    1,963
    Apr 3, 2007
     
  12. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,292
    5,287
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    I was referring to widespread detection tests. Not vaccine testing or antibody testing. Scientists have been working on the latter since this started to spread on China.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  13. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,292
    5,287
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Agreed. And earlier too. That is what the Oxford scientists posit.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. LouisvilleGator

    LouisvilleGator GC Hall of Fame

    1,180
    189
    1,933
    Oct 16, 2012

    I keep seeing this narrative regurgitated, but I would like to know what previous pandemics the U.S. started testing for en masse when there were only 60 known cases here? My understanding is that generally speaking, mass testing doesn't really kick in until the problem spreads a little more than that. Does anybody have any examples of previous epidemics or pandemics where the U.S. started mass testing protocols when there were less than a 100 confirmed cases of something? This is a narrative people are dreaming up out of thin air, as if we would have normally reacted a lot quicker in the past. That's just not true.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  15. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,814
    808
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    I hope "they" do a better job with the serological tests than "they" did with the PCR tests. Mo info faster mo better.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  16. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,730
    1,789
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    The first known case of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic was identified April 15th. The first test was ready April 28th.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  17. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,519
    1,775
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    Did you read the story?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. gatorstevelp

    gatorstevelp Premium Member

    2,773
    747
    1,963
    Apr 3, 2007
    Just love how some know it alls think they know it all and know how or what others will or will not acknowledge. I think I have been very level-headed through out this thread.

    There is no human on this planet who knows exactly how this plays out, from here, but the unhindered medical community will come up with something sooner than later.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  19. LouisvilleGator

    LouisvilleGator GC Hall of Fame

    1,180
    189
    1,933
    Oct 16, 2012
    LOL, did you read my post? So they had ONE test on April 28th? I said testing "en masse", which would indicate the widespread testing capability that so many of you on the left want everybody to think we should have had in place before this spread like wildfire.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. LouisvilleGator

    LouisvilleGator GC Hall of Fame

    1,180
    189
    1,933
    Oct 16, 2012
    It's a very long story that does absolutely zero to address the questions in my post. In fact, I would say many of the challenges the CDC faced was due to the fact that the virus was so new and there had been so little American exposure at the time. The problem with all this finger-pointing, as I have pointed out in other places, is that it ignores the fact that pretty much the entire industrialized world is having our same plight. You might have a point if we were one of only a handful of countries dealing with this. You guys are just so partisan that you can't admit that viral outbreaks like this would have presented any administration with a lot of challenges and it's highly doubtful another administration would have stopped the spread here when you consider the entire world is being rocked by this thing.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1