The FBI does not make a judgement one way or the other on these interviews. They just provide the information that is given to them to the JC. *I'm also pretty darn sure that the FBI wants no part of digging up anything on Dr. Ford that might make her look bad.
How does that relate to Kavanaugh when she said that Kavanaugh was not one of her attackers? All she saw was Kavanaugh giving out Solo cups at a party.
Did you miss the Republicans trying to push it through with a vote before any investigation? They don't want anything approaching due diligence. What he's saying isn't remotely crazy. Once you're on SCOTUS, it's nearly impossible to get you off of it.
Her observations of Kavanaugh are the only thing relevant at this point. If there is corroborative evidence that she's telling the truth, it would lend credence to what Ramirez and Ford are alleging. However, to this point, we have no evidence that she's telling the truth.
In the case of background investigations the FBI is, in effect, a client of the White House. The Bureau investigates what the White House wants it to investigate.
From a couple of days ago wrt narrow scope: FBI's Kavanaugh investigation narrow in scope - CNNPolitics More recent articles indicate an increase in scope but still a lot of people who have tried to come forward but have not been contacted. FBI has not contacted dozens of potential sources in Kavanaugh investigation
Was there ever any doubt they would immediately discredit the very ones they begged to have investigate this, after preventing said investigation for 40 days by sitting on allegations in the first place? Bunch of snakes.
The guys been through SIX FBI background chex. Doc Ford was thrown on them last min, and was not that compelling (hence the desperate flailing for something, anything, else). Dems had their circus, sullied kavs name...but at the end of the day, still short, against 25 yr. Career, 6 BG chx, and more questions fielded than ALL SCOTSs combined. Plenty of dilligence done. Only shit leftys can come up with, is allllllll the way back to college n hs. Nothing since hes been a laeyer, let alone a judge.
You know how you make them look bad for trying to discredit your investigation? You actually hold a real investigation. When you offer up a half-assed sham of an investigation, you play right into their hands.
How are her observations of Kavanaugh relevant at this point? Kavanaugh handed out solo cups at parties, what does that have to do with Dr. Ford's allegations? And no one in Kavanaugh's circle states they remember her. No one who she has named as a witness can back up her story. And she still has not explained what she was doing going to a high school parties after being in college and if you follow her timeline, she continued to attend those parties with the same people after she says she was attacked.
The only issue the FBI is charged with investigsting, is doc Ford. There are only 4 witnesses identified, none of whom remembers any party, so no more witnesses to the incident. Cest la vie. Y'all act like theyre supposed to start from scratch. In one week. Process is over, save for doc Ford allegation. Sorry if you've been misled by the MSM politiburo.
The Democrats in the Senate said this could be cleared up by a quick FBI investigation before last Friday. The FBI just did a quick investigation and now the Democratic Senators are unhappy about it? Here is my reaction:
There are ways of getting around that or just playing lip service to it. The FBI wanted no part of this investigation and are trying to get it wrapped up as fast as possible because there is no way that this investigation ends that makes everyone happy. They saw how that worked out in '16 and have learned their lesson.
I'm still waiting for you to make an intellectually honest argument. The blind partisanship gets a bit old. The Democrats were fine with a limited DURATION, as I told you previously. The Democrats expected a legitimate investigation, not one that was hamstrung by Kavanaugh's friend in the WH. Republicans are demanding corroboration, but the FBI isn't being allowed to speak with potential corroborating witnesses. I hope you see the hypocrisy there. I hope you understand why that undermines the investigation. Her observations of him drunkenly groping women and trying to remove their clothes without their consent are quite relevant. However, as it stands now, she lacks credibility.
Concur. ...and i hope to see fa fair amount of footage of the kav hearing... ...to remind the electorate what dirty ass power grubbing PsOS the libby- Prog dems are.
Trump is making sure all of his voters show up in the mid-terms, something previous presidents have been unable to do or have even tried to do. If you're a Dem running +1 or +2 in states that Trump won, you're probably not going to win.
Yesh? Well im still waiting for YOUR *intellectually honsest* explanation, for how you reconcile dismissing Erika Kman as a cleat chasin perjuror wrt Rapeis Winston--in spite of a sworn statement--which you said wss proof that a thing happened.... ....while believing doc Ford wholly, bc she signed a sworn statement..which of course (according to yo own seff), is proof that it happened. Aside from your nolie love, and lefty politics...( i guess thats the part you cant negotiate--which makes your arguments....intellectually dishonest). LOL!
