He held his temper and composure a lot better than I would. It was only creditable in yours and other liberals eyes. Which does not make the accusation true. Ford was caught lying numerous time. How you can get creditable out of her naming three people to back up her lie and they then called her out for the liar she is sure is strange. Maybe she better check with them first next time
Good. Just make sure it's not simply that Ford's lawyer has a volunteer position with an organization that has received money from Soros, given that the group has received money from dozens of sources, including rightwing ones.
Here's your proof: The Cinematic Railroading of Jameis Winston | National Review More important, the film does not mention the critical fact that two different police-ordered toxicology reports of Kinsman’s blood showed that no known date-rape or other known drug (and not much alcohol) was in her system. The second test, done by the prominent Dr. Bruce Goldberger of the University of Florida pathology laboratories after Kinsman’s lawyer refused to believe the first, was negative for 172 different drugs and their metabolites. This virtually proves that Kinsman’s claim in the film that she was drugged was false, and she must have known it. Obviously she knew the test results. And obviously the filmmakers knew if they were the least bit careful. Also omitted from the film is the stunning fact that in her 28 pages of testimony to Justice Harding last December 2, she never suggested that she had been drugged or made “incompetent.” (Given the film’s release date, apparently her testimony came after her on-camera interview.) --------------------------------------------- As I said earlier in this thread, I have a tremendous memory. I am full of useless facts.
If Ford was caught lying "numerous" times, I'd hate to know how often Kavanaugh was caught lying. What's three or four times as much as "numerous?"(and that's being generous to Kavanaugh) Also, there was that cool graph posted earlier that showed Kavanaugh not answering questions far too often, whereas Ford answered the questions she was asked.
Another thing, sure it doesn't make the accusation true. It's basically a classic he said/she said, in large part due to time. If the accusation is credible in my mind because I am liberal, it's only that I consciously choose not to immediately dismiss out of hand the accusation as untrue. Can can you say the same?
I'm not going to go into the details of the case because it has been discussed countless times on this board, but you've repeated a ton of misinformation about this case in this thread.
Would someone smarter and more up to date please fill me in. Did Dr Ford ever find anyone to corroborate her assertion that she was at the party? Are there any witnesses to her (and his presence)?
Not the most reliable source for sure, but this one is out there. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ford-george-soros/ Alleged pic of Ford and Soros:
No, I haven't. Everything I said came out of the report. Somebody just tried to call me on the "misinformation," and it turns out that what I said was 100% accurate.
If she was 15 years old at the time, how did (soon to be) Dr Ford get to the party? Did she drive herself (at 15)? How did she get home? Did she drive herself?
Well, well, well, look what we have here: Dr. Ford trying to convince Donald Trump of her lies. Put that microphone down, Dr. Ford, and leave our President alone!
