I edited my post, keep reading... Even with that standard, you're still ignoring many false reports... In other words, the study isn't proof that there are more true reports than false reports... Even if I believe it...
Entering the room to the NWO theme would be a nice start. Needs to channel his inner Thomas (as you said) and his inner Trump. He may have neither of these.
Feel free to read my comments on this forum regarding Bill Clinton. They prove you wrong. I get it. It's easier to dig your hole deeper than admit you are wrong. You can call BS all you want. You are still wrong.
Find me one reputable study that found more false reports than true reports. I offered up evidence. It's your turn.
Yeah, I'm sure the entitled white guy thing will play well, maybe he can claim to be the victim of high-tech lynching. Sure that would help. This is just a white Yale frat bro, there's no 'racial progress' angle here like Thomas had.
Except your evidence does a better job of proving my point than your point... 1. Even with a strict standard of allegations proven to be false, between 2 and 10 percent of allegations are false... that's certainly enough for men to be worried about it, when society is expected to "believe women." 2. This standard ignores many gray area cases, which describe the majority of cases, where there is little evidence proving that the allegations are true or false... Therefore, there are likely even more cases that aren't addressed in the study that involve false reports...
Why didn't her husband come to the hearing? I find that odd since I can't imagine my wife going through something like this without me. Has there been any thing said about this?
He seems to be copying Clarence Thomas, at least at the start, which is good... but he shouldn't have been so blatant about that...
