If one relies on Trump for his news it's understandable that he would believe it's all a con. After all that's what the Dear Leader has said. Trump: Kavanaugh Allegations Are a 'Big Fat Con.' - The Atlantic
Feel free to tell all the experts your findings. Because it directly conflicts with theirs. I posted an article from an expert discussing it multiple times.
and all were completely silent until two months ago.... I love the claims about all the wild gang rape parties that went on with that private school......no one ever said a word. EVER!
Remarkable. You can narrow down your sophomore year to the 2 calendar years covered thereby, almost 20 years before her event.... You can narrow down to the year, almost 20 years prior, when you got your DL.... Both in the mid-60's She couldn't decide whether this supposedly traumatic event occurred in early or mid 80's... Not that is, without knowing when Mark Judge started working at wherever. FWIW, I can tell you what year I graduated from jr. high school ('84), got my DL ('86), was a sophomore in HS ('85-'86)...my first car wreck ('86)... Sorry...if this event was so traumatic, she wouldn't have to deliberate b't early vs. mid '80's. She'd prolly be able to recite not just the year, but the date, day of teh week, if it was rainy or sunny, hot or cold etc. outside. A'int buying it.
and when one relies on hating conservativism....things like "innocent until proven guilty" and supporting evidence goes right out the window
This is a political process, not a court. If enough people out there believe the woman and it would influence their vote in November, then the political thing to do is pull the nomination so as not to lose the senate. The senate won't confirm if their jobs and control are in jeopardy, but politically it's better to not have the vote at all. I think as of yesterday the GOP thought they had the votes to confirm as they are pushing forward full steam, but they will take the temperature again in a day or so after the public absorbs the results of this hearing.
Investigating a sexual assault that occurred 36 years ago, where the accuser can't remember the date, address it took place and where no bodily fluids were exchanged, let alone forensic evidence left to be sampled after 36 years, is impossible for any law enforcement body, including the FBI. Just wish the Crats would at least be honest about that simple fact.
I don't attack victims......political operatives on the hand are not victims and the democrats effort to conflate the two for political purposes is quite frankly disgusting
Also, nearly no questions have been pertaining to the actual alleged event, itself... Just assessing her credibility, and when she initially brought this up (2012), and whether or not she, herself, believes the allegations.
I'm willing to wait and see how it plays out.....(no way Tennessee comes back from being 28 points down!).
That would make sense and to be expected. People will remember the traumatic experience, not necessarily run of the mill details.
To me, thus far, it looks like 90% or more of the political games are coming from her attorneys and Democratic politicians... not Ford, herself....
Because it's all about delay past the elections. That if they can get this pushed past then and they then control the senate they can stop all future appointments.
Do you have any studies or data backing this up? When you call a victim a political operative, you're attacking the victim.
So the fact she only had one beer happened to part of the traumatic experience or just an important detail to "remember" so she doesn't come off drunk during the party?
