Kavanaugh Hearing

It's all about the boy's club.

 

My philosophy is live and let live. You and your "little gray men" can go crazy with the anal probes. I won't judge you.

 

I think that honor goes to Feinstein... lol

 

We also know that Brett Kavanaugh's character has been attacked. The FBI HAD to meet with her about this. They would be seriously remiss if they did not look into it. Of course she has left her home. I would too if all those liberal reporters were parked in front of my house.

Now it is time for her to state her case and produce her evidence. Her word is obviously good enough for you, as I would imagine Anita Hill's was. It's not good enough for me. BTW, how many other women have accused Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment?

 

Angela Wright did, but she wasn't allowed to testify. And then Moira Smith accused him of sexual assault at a conference after Thomas was already on the Court. Anita Hill's word was good enough for me. Anita Hill was vindicated. It's too bad she was treated so poorly and disbelieved.

 

He's tripping over himself at the chance to bow down and kiss the guy's feet. That tweet is positively dripping with partisanship. No matter what she says or brings forward, this guy's mind is as obviously already made up as AgingGator.

She could provide a notarized HD video of it and it wouldn't matter. Can tell by the way he grovels to kavanaugh in that tweet.

 

Forgive me if I'm less concerned with poor Kavanaugh's feelings and character than with 36+ years of torment that this woman went through if true.

 

To be completely honest with you, I could not give two $hit$ who you judge. And BTW, you believing a woman with political motives who has made an accusation against a highly regarded judge that he allegedly attacked her 36 years ago when they were in high school without providing one iota of evidence precludes you from calling anyone partisan .

 

You are literally the most biased partisan person on this board that I have not yet blocked. Pot meet kettle here.

 

Your political motives argument is a failure. There's corroboration from 2012. Feel free to pitch us the conspiracy that goes back to 2012. I'll wait.

 

Your wrong Egg Roll, if she provides any evidence AT ALL I'll be the first to examine her evidence and make my judgement based on facts, not feelings.

Until then, I will view this as what it so far appears to be, another Democrat hit job!

 

You might want to qualify that. If she testifies to the Committee, she has provided evidence.

 

You and your buddy are more than welcome to block me any time you want. Believe me, my feelings won't be hurt.

 

Ooo!! I love Egg Rolls. Yes I'll have one please. Didn't know we were placing orders!!!

 

Well so far she has refused to do that now, hasn't she? When/if she does, I will objectively hear her out.

 

Last I saw, they were still negotiating over the parameters. We'll see what happens in the coming days, but at this point in time, she's not refusing.

 

Nah

She agreed to testify under certain conditions. That's not a refusal.

 

If no evidence has been presented, how can anything be corroborated?

 

You should go back about 20 pages and read. We've already beaten that horse to death.

 

The offers she has made in these negotiations are akin to me going down to Mercedes Benz of Orlando and offering them $25K for an AMG SL. MBoO would not, and should not accept that offer.